CASE STUDY: PAY STRUCTURES AND JOB ARCHITECTURE

Creating and implementing a consistent pay structure for a regional charity

Employee engagement, job evaluation, benchmarking and pay modelling for an organisation

The client

A regional charity employing around 125 people across a range of service-delivery, professional, support and leadership roles.

The challenge

The charity was operating in a difficult recruitment market while employees were also experiencing significant cost-of-living pressures. It wanted to ensure that people were paid appropriately while developing an approach that was fair, affordable and sustainable.

The existing pay arrangements had developed on a team-by-team basis and lacked consistency. There was no single organisation-wide structure defining the relationships between roles, grades and salaries or providing a clear basis for future pay decisions.

The charity therefore commissioned EBRS to review the overall reward framework, including employee views, job evaluation, pay structures, market competitiveness and benefits.

Our approach

EBRS brought together employee feedback, analytical job evaluation, market evidence and financial modelling to develop a practical structure suited to the charity.

a) Listening to employees

We designed and conducted an online employee reward survey, receiving responses from two-thirds of the employees. The results were collated and reported in an aggregated form to protect anonymity.

The survey explored employee views on the existing pay arrangements, pay progression, performance management, benefits, development and recognition.

The findings highlighted areas where employees wanted greater clarity and consistency. They also helped the charity understand which benefits were most valued, where awareness was limited and what employees wanted the review to address.

This ensured that employee feedback directly informed the development of the new arrangements.

b) Evaluating roles and designing the structure

We analytically evaluated roles using the EBRS Role-Check job evaluation system, assessing the requirements of each job rather than the capabilities or performance of the individual undertaking it.

The results provided a consistent basis for comparing roles across different teams and functions. Roles were grouped according to their size and characteristics to form the basis of a new organisation-wide grade structure.

We also developed a job matching framework defining the expectations at each level. This gave the charity a practical method for assessing new and changed roles and helped establish clearer links between role requirements, employee development and its emerging competency framework.

c) Benchmarking and modelling the pay arrangements

Once the internal structure had been established, we benchmarked roles using evidence from the not-for-profit, health and wider employment markets.

Rather than relying on job titles alone, we considered the responsibilities and assessed size of each role before selecting relevant salary data, advertised vacancies and recruitment evidence.

We then developed a detailed pay model bringing together:

  • the role assessments and proposed grades;

  • external salary benchmarks;

  • existing salaries and pay arrangements;

  • alternative salary ranges;

  • implementation costs; and

  • the effect of different options on individual employees.

This enabled the charity to test the affordability and fairness of the proposed structure before deciding how it should be implemented.

We also reviewed the employee benefits package, drawing on employee feedback and external comparisons to identify practical improvements.

d) Implementation and outcomes

The new grades and pay scales were successfully introduced across the organisation. The project resulted in:

  • one consistent organisation-wide grade and pay structure;

  • clearer relationships between roles and salary levels;

  • improved clarity around role expectations;

  • stronger links with the developing competency framework;

  • clearer opportunities for employee growth and development;

  • improvements to the benefits package, including paid volunteering leave; and

  • a range of pay increases across the organisation.

The new structure also provided a consistent foundation for future organisation-wide pay awards.

EBRS presented the work at an employee away day, explaining how employee feedback had been used, how roles had been assessed and how the new arrangements had been developed.

The value of the work

The project replaced inconsistent team-level arrangements with a clear and consolidated approach covering the whole charity.

It enabled the organisation to:

  • make pay decisions within a consistent framework;

  • explain how roles relate to one another;

  • use market evidence more reliably;

  • understand the costs and employee impact of different options;

  • improve valued aspects of the benefits package; and

  • manage new and changed roles more consistently in the future.

By combining employee voice, analytical job evaluation, market benchmarking and practical pay modelling, EBRS helped the charity move from a fragmented approach to a structure that supported fairness, transparency and employee development.

Need to review your pay structure?

Whether your existing arrangements have developed inconsistently or no longer reflect your roles, EBRS can combine employee engagement, job evaluation, market evidence and pay modelling to help you develop a practical approach suited to your organisation.